Determinants of Financial Statement Fraud Using the Fraud Hexagon Theory Approach

Main Article Content

Sri Dwiningsih
Alfiah
Muhammad Faizal Firdaus

Abstract

This research was conducted to analyze and determine the effect of financial stability, external pressure, supervision, change of auditors, change of directors, arrogance and collusion from the Fraud Hexagon Theory approach to fraudulent financial statements. The sample of this study were 20 state-owned companies listed on the IDX from 2017 to 2021. The data collection technique used was the documentation method. Data analysis techniques using Descriptive Statistical Analysis, Partial Test (t test) and Simultaneous Test (F Test). The results of the research are based on the results of calculations and analysis of the variables of financial stability, external pressure, supervision, changes in directors, arrogance and collusion have no effect on fraudulent financial statements, while auditor turnover variables have an effect on fraudulent financial statements

Article Details

How to Cite
Dwiningsih, S., Alfiah, & Firdaus, M. F. (2024). Determinants of Financial Statement Fraud Using the Fraud Hexagon Theory Approach. TGO Journal of Education, Science and Technology, 2(1), 8–16. Retrieved from https://ejournal.trescode.org/index.php/jest/article/view/67
Section
Articles

References

Apriliana, S., & Agustina, L. (2017). The analysis of fraudulent financial reporting determinant through fraud pentagon approach. Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi, 9(2), 154–165.

Hildayani, R., & Serly, V. (2021). Pengaruh Tekanan, Peluang, Rasionalisasi dan Nilai Etika terhadap Intensi Kecurangan Karyawan: Studi Kasus pada Perusahaan BUMN. Jurnal Eksplorasi Akuntansi, 3(4), 734–748.

Jannah, V. M., Andreas, A., & Rasuli, M. (2021). Pendekatan Vousinas Fraud Hexagon Model dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan Pelaporan Keuangan. Studi Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 4(1), 1–16.

Lionardi, M., & Suhartono, S. (2022). Pendeteksian Kemungkinan Terjadinya Fraudulent Financial Statement menggunakan Fraud Hexagon. Moneter-Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 9(1), 29–38.

Mardianto, M., & Tiono, C. (2019). Analisis pengaruh fraud triangle dalam mendeteksi kecurangan laporan keuangan. Jurnal Benefita, 4(1), 87–103.

Nadziliyah, H., & Primasari, N. S. (2022). Analisis Fraud Hexagon Terhadap Financial Statement Fraud Pada Perusahaan Sektor Infrastruktur, Utilitas Dan Transportasi. Accounting and Finance Studies, 2(1), 21–39.

Octaviana, N. (2022). Analisis Elemen-Elemen Fraud Hexagon Theory Sebagai Determinan Fraudulent Financial Reporting. Jurnal Akuntansi, 11(2), 106–121.

Purnama, D., Mutiarani, G., Yuanita, M., & Lucyanda, J. (2022). Pengujian Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Menggunakan Fraud Hexagon Model. Media Riset Akuntansi, 12(1), 109–128.

Sugiyono, S. (2004). Pengaruh pembinaan kepala sekolah, motivasi kerja, dan pengalaman diklat terhadap kinerja guru dalam pembelajaran bahasa Madura di SDN Kecamatan Bangkalan Kabupaten Bangkalan Madura. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 6(1).

Sukmadilaga, C., Winarningsih, S., Handayani, T., Herianti, E., & Ghani, E. K. (2022). Fraudulent Financial Reporting in Ministerial and Governmental Institutions in Indonesia: An Analysis Using Hexagon Theory. Economies, 10(4), 86.

Vousinas, G. L. (2019). Advancing theory of fraud: the SCORE model. Journal of Financial Crime, 26(1), 372–381.