Analysis of the Fulfillment of Human Rights in Pretrial Mechanisms According to the Criminal Justice System Perspective
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article discusses the effectiveness of pretrial in protecting human rights in the justice system in Indonesia. Pretrial is an important legal mechanism in realizing justice and protection for individuals who are considered to have the potential to become victims of human rights violations in the legal process. This article uses a normative type research method with descriptive analysis methods to understand in depth how pretrial works in protecting human rights. The legal source material for this article was collectedthrough literature study and analysis of the latest legal developments related to pretrial and human rights. The research results show that pretrial proceedings have played an important role in protecting human rights, especially when there are indications of procedural errors, abuse of authority, or potential violations of human rights in the judicial process in Indonesia. Pretrials have provided an opportunity for individuals to have their cases reviewed before they are decided by the court. Pretrial has great potential in protecting human rights in the justice system. Considering the cases of human rights violations that occur in the Indonesian justice system, can pretrials demonstrate effectiveness in ensuring that the human rights of every individual are maintained and respected in the legal process.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Ali, M., & Farhana. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia Terhadap Korban Unlawful Killing Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia. Reformasi Hukum, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.46257/jrh.v27i1.601
Darwin, D., Dahlan, D., & Suhaimi, S. (2019). Analisis Yuridis Putusan Praperadilan dalam Perspektif Sistem Peradilan Pidana. JURNAL MERCATORIA, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.31289/mercatoria.v12i1.2363
Dinda, C. P., Usman, U., & Munandar, T. I. (2021). Praperadilan Terhadap Penetapan Status Tersangka Tindak Pidana Korupsi oleh Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.22437/pampas.v1i2.9568
Durahman, D. (2017). Pemberantasan Praktek Penyimpangan Peradilan di Indonesia. Wacana Paramarta: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 16(1).
Firmansyah, S. H., & Farid, A. M. (2022). Politik Hukum Praperadilan sebagai Lembaga Perlindungan Hak Tersangka Ditinjau dari Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 21/PUU-XII/2014 mengenai Penetapan Tersangka. Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Dan Keadilan, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.18196/jphk.v3i2.15195
Jonaedi Efendi dan Johnny Ibrahim. (2018). Metode penelitian hukum: normatif dan empiris / Jonaedi Efendi, Johnny Ibrahim. Kencana, 2(Hukum).
Kartadinata, A. (2023). Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Pertimbangan Hakim Praperadilan. Viva Themis Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.24967/vt.v6i1.2087
Kumala Sari, R., & Budoyo, S. (2019). Perkembangan Pengaturan Hak Asasi Manusia (Ham) Dalam Hukum Di Indonesia. Jurnal Meta Yuridis. https://doi.org/10.26877/m-y.v2i2.4686
Moeliono, T. P. (2015). Asas legalitas dalam hukum acara pidana: kritikan terhadap putusan mk tentang praperadilan. Jurnal hukum ius quia iustum, 22(4). https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol22.iss4.art4
Purba, T. L. D. (2018). Praperadilan Sebagai Upaya Hukum Bagi Tersangka. Papua Law Journal, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.31957/plj.v1i2.591
Rusman Sumadi. (2021). Praperadilan Sebagai Sarana Kontrol Dalam Melindungi Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM) Tersangka. Jurnal Hukum Sasana, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.31599/sasana.v7i1.597
Susanto, A. F., & B., G. T. (2016). Penelitian hukum transformatif partisipatoris: sebuah gagasan dan konsep awal. Litigasi, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.23969/litigasi.v17i2.159
Toweula, A. (2022). Perbandingan Proses Peradilan Pelanggaran Ham Berat Dengan Tindak Pidana Umum Di Indonesia. Lex Administratum.