Analysis of the Ratio Decidendi in Assessing the Strength of Evidence of Crown Witnesses (Case Study of Verdict Number 41/Pid.B/2021/PN Bil)

Main Article Content

Vincentius Patria Setyawan

Abstract

Witness testimony is evidence that is often the key word in revealing that a crime has occurred. This research aims to determine the position of the crown witness so that the judge can consider it in proving the crime of assisting in premeditated murder in Decision Number 41/Pid.B/2021/PN Bil. This research is normative legal research that is prescriptive and applied. This research uses a case approach. The legal materials used are primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The technique for collecting legal materials used in this legal research is literature study. The results of this research show that in Decision Number 41/Pid.B/2021/PN Bil, the crown witnesses were considered by the judge. The use of crown witnesses is permitted while still observing the provisions in nominating crown witnesses. These provisions include the separation of case files, lack of evidence, and criminal acts involved form of participation. The judge's considerations in Decision Number 41/Pid.B/2021/PN Bil which used crown witnesses were in accordance with the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code. Based on the evidence presented by the public prosecutor which was strengthened by the testimony of crown witnesses, the judge was convinced that the crime had actually occurred and that the defendant was guilty of committing it. The use of crown witnesses in this case can make it easier for the judge to impose a crime on the defendant who helped commit premeditated murder.

Article Details

How to Cite
Patria Setyawan, V. (2024). Analysis of the Ratio Decidendi in Assessing the Strength of Evidence of Crown Witnesses (Case Study of Verdict Number 41/Pid.B/2021/PN Bil). TGO Journal of Education, Science and Technology, 2(1), 76–82. Retrieved from https://ejournal.trescode.org/index.php/jest/article/view/83
Section
Articles

References

Akhyar, A., Danialsyah, D., & Bukhari, B. (2023). ANALISIS YURIDIS TINDAK PIDANA PEMBUNUHAN DISERTAI PEMERKOSAAN (Analisis Putusan Nomor 271/Pid.B/2019/PN Mrb). Jurnal Ilmiah METADATA, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.47652/metadata.v5i3.395

Hertoni, M. (2016). Independensi Hakim Dalam Mencari Kebenaran Materiil. Lex Crimen, 5(1).

Lia, N., & Jumadi. (2022). Analisis Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Terkait Vonis Hukuman Mati Terhadap Pelaku Pembunuhan Berencana Satu Keluarga di Kota Makassar. Alauddin Law Development Journal, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.24252/aldev.v4i1.16138

Lintogareng, J. (2013). ANALISA KEYAKINAN HAKIM DALAM PENGAMBILAN KEPUTUSAN PERKARA PIDANA DI PENGADILAN. LEX CRIMEN, 2(3).

Marzuki, P. M. (2022). Penelitian Hukum, cetakan ke-11. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 4(2).

Prameswari, N., & Yulianti, S. W. (2015). Kedudukan Alat Bukti Petunjuk Di Ranah Hukum Acara Pidana. Verstek, 3(2).

Rahman, H., Purwastuty, L., & Rakhmawati, D. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Saksi Mahkota dalam Proses Pemeriksaan Perkara Pidana. PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.22437/pampas.v1i3.11088

Ramadhani, S. K. (2022). Dasar Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Menjatuhkan Sanksi Pidana Penjara Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pencurian Dengan Kekerasan. Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya.

Samandari, N. A., Chandrawila S, W., & Rahim, A. H. (2017). KEKUATAN PEMBUKTIAN REKAM MEDIS KONVENSIONAL DAN ELEKTRONIK. SOEPRA, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.24167/shk.v2i2.818

Siregar, R. M. D. (2015). Legalitas Keterangan Saksi melalui Teleconference sebagai Alat Bukti dalam Perkara Pidana. Jurnal Jurisprudensi, Vol. 5 No. 1.

Sukadana, I. M., Amiruddin, A., & Parman, L. (2018). ALAT BUKTI KETERANGAN SAKSI MAHKOTA DALAM PERKARA PIDANA PENCURIAN. LAW REFORM, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v14i2.20873

Suprapta, I. N. A., Sukadana, I. K., & Widyantara, I. M. M. (2020). Pembantuan dalam Tindak Pidana Perjudian (Studi Putusan Nomor 94/Pid.B/2017/PN Gin). Jurnal Analogi Hukum, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.22225/ah.2.3.2491.278-282